Wednesday, June 30

Taking Blogs to Business
by
jonh
on June 30, 2004 02:58PM (PDT)
Dave Pollard does it again. Here's his recipe for helping business organizations consider, test and implement the use of blogs.
Very well done. An excerpt:
I've written before about Blogs in Business and the role I think they could play. But my idealism -- the desire to have a better, simpler blog product with some better social networking functionality before we try to sell it to business -- is giving way to my impatience. A couple of business leaders have challenged me to develop a pragmatic strategy for effectively introducing blogs into a business today. Here's what I said.
First, the strategy for doing so must respect some fairly unorthodox principles. If it doesn't, blogs will just end up being one more awkward and confusing part of already unwieldy and underused corporate Intranets. |

Thought For the Day
by
jonh
on June 30, 2004 07:39AM (PDT)
...thanks to Hugh Macleod of Gaping Void:
Tuesday, June 29

Ross Rader on Blogging
by
jonh
on June 29, 2004 04:40PM (PDT)
From Ross' blog
 Life is like a blog...
by Ross on June 23, 2004 09:38AM (EDT)
Centre Daily Times: "A guy named Jason is making a case for why people should go to church naked."
I'm really enjoying seeing more and more of these articles as weblogs move up the adoption curve. Yes, this is still very early stage stuff - I don't think that the technology has crossed the chasm yet, but it has every appearance of being well on its way.
But of course, this begs the question - what will be the bloggings killer feature? The one that people can't live without, the one that puts blogs over the top.
The one that moves blogging beyond being a curious distraction like the Rubiks Cube and the pet rock.

RSS - Will It Need a "Digital Pencil" ... ?
by
jonh
on June 29, 2004 07:33AM (PDT)
... to start composing as the webfeeds keep rolling in ?
From Dave Winer's scripting.com:
Apple: "Safari RSS, a new version of Apple’s innovative web browser that provides instant access to the most current RSS information on the web." 
Apple also announced Tiger Server, which includes David Czarnecki's Blojsom weblog CMS bundled, an XML-RPC interface, as well as publishing content in RSS. 
Here's a really cool demo of their RSS reader. Based on squinting at this demo, it appears they did it right. It's not three-pane, it's one panel, with the items displayed, from all your feeds, in reverse chronologic order. This is the most efficient way to read for the user. A lot of designers think RSS readers should work just like mail apps, but that's too inefficient. With mail you need to keep spam and mail list content segregated. For news, you need a different interface. I've been saying it for years, the Apple designers apparently didn't get sucked into the design mistake so many have. One thing I wish Apple had done differently is respect the white-on-orange icon. Such a small thing, but so important. One would think Apple, of all, would understand the value of consistent user interface. 
Monday, June 28

Does RSS Spell doom for E-mail Newsletters
by
fred
on June 28, 2004 09:58PM (PDT)
Ninety-nine out of 100 people can't tell you what RSS (Really Simple Syndication) stands for. And while some predict that RSS message feeds may soon topple e-mail, even the most liberal estimates suggest that no more than 5 percent of computer users have experimented with it. Yet many publishers of e-mail newsletters devote lots of energy to developing RSS feeds. What is all the fuss about? -- The pros -- RSS has been around for a while, but recently it has made its mark as an alternative to e-mail newsletters. Users download a program to retrieve messages from companies that provide information "feeds." It's the basis for Web log technology, and it may one day give e-mail platforms substantial competition. Here's why: The feeds enable pull instead of push technology, and are not intrusive. Users subscribe only to the messages they wish to receive. The feeds steer clear of e-mail blockers and filters that often prevent critical content from being delivered. Also, few media companies offering RSS feeds ask subscribers to share information about themselves (of course, this will likely change: few Web sites required user registration in the nascent days of the Internet). The simple truth is that RSS technology has the potential to bypass inbox clutter, and companies want to be ready if it does. "Spam is killing e-mail as a communications channel," says Mark Fletcher, founder and CEO of Trustic, the parent company of news aggregator Bloglines. "People are suffering from information overload and they are starting to fear the e-mail inbox." -- The cons -- RSS has its drawbacks as well. Senders of RSS feeds generally can't use images, sound or other rich media; a quick headline and blurb must suffice, with a link to more content on a Web site. "They can't control how the content is presented or how it commingles with other content," notes Peter Mesnik, co-founder and chief technology officer of e-marketing and analytics firm IMN. Similarly, RSS offers little in the way of customization. "It's one-size- fits-all, blasted to everyone," says EmailLabs CEO Dave Sousa. There's little evidence suggesting that the feeds drive sales and bolster brands anywhere near as effectively as e-mail newsletters do. And while the feeds are trackable, no industry-standard metrics exist to gauge their reach and⁄or impact. When asked how many people are subscribed to his company's feeds, John Roberts, associate vice president of product development for news at CNET's News.com, concedes that he doesn't know. "We look at things in terms of how much traffic comes back to our site [from the feeds], and that's gone up every month," he says. "Would I love to be able to give figures that third parties would accept or understand? Of course I would. But we're not there yet." Pundits vary wildly in their estimates as to when RSS will truly become a mainstream communications tool. Guesses range anywhere from later this year to 2007 and beyond, but most believe it will get there eventually. "If you plot the amount of garbage e-mail, the breaking point is coming sooner than anybody thinks," Peterson argues. But Sousa, an interested party given his company's focus on e-mail marketing, cautions RSS boosters that e-mail shouldn't yet be counted out. Powered by Quickdraft
Sunday, June 27

OK - How Much More "Proof" Do We Need ?
by
jonh
on June 27, 2004 10:41PM (PDT)
Via Earl Mardle's blog - an interesting story on the development of a tool that seems very very similar in concept to the tool we are developing.
I've even been testing out the metaphor of a "digital pencil" for the Knowledge Age with my colleagues.
Thanks, Earl.
Minority report - Here We Come
No, not the suspended animation stuff, the super cool gloves and the 3D holographic, interactive, all-enveloping display. This from the BBC Digital pen plus Pick and Beam
Dr Rekimoto's lab has extended the drag and drop technique used in most PC software to create a 'pick and drop' technique. So the owner of a handheld computer can pick up a file from their device, using a special pen, and drop it onto the screen of another computer, by placing the pen on its screen. These technologies are very interesting for truly intuitive interaction Ian McClelland, Philips He refers to this approach as 'direct manipulation'. It allows people to visually select and move information in physical space, rather than having to understand abstract concepts of networks and servers. The pick and drop technique would make it easy for two colleagues in a meeting to exchange files between their laptop computers, new acquaintances to pass each other electronic business cards, or friends to swap references to websites or music tracks they like.
Another technique that the labs has developed is referred to as 'pick and beam'. This uses displays projected onto tables and walls, using data projectors, that act as extended working spaces. Documents can be dragged using a special pen from a computer desktop into these spaces. There they can be spread out or exchanged, allowing people to work with them almost as if they were paper documents. Remember the mouse "These technologies are very interesting for truly intuitive interaction," said Ian McClelland, a senior design consultant at Philips Digital Systems Laboratory in the Netherlands.
Continue reading "Minority report - Here We Come"

Weinberger on Blogging in Corporations
by
jonh
on June 27, 2004 09:33PM (PDT)
On JOHO, a bit of a pushback to Scott Rosenberg's dismal forecast:
I do agree that it'll take a long time for corporate public blogging to spread beyond easy industries, such as high tech. But, I think it'll happen faster than Scott does. First, internal blogging will happen relatively quickly because it's a great way for employees to build their reputations, a motive as powerful as the urge not to piss off your boss. Those internal blogs will go onto the extranet and eventually some will make it onto the Internet.
Second, the first public blogs we're likely to see outside of the sw industry will be more like the Dean blog than anything else: They'll be always upbeat but still lively, full of voice, and worth reading by enthusiasts.
[Note: I have never been right with a single prediction.]
Saturday, June 26

A VC's POV on Social Networking and Social Software
by
jonh
on June 26, 2004 10:44PM (PDT)
From David Hornik on Venture Blog.
As a pitch, it's a bit long, and so it probably wouldn't get any serious listening-to past about the third "blah".
As a point of view, it's what many software developers and technology business people have to look forward to - even though it's at least a reasonable bet that there have been many odd twists and turns in human behaviour due to sociology in the last few hundred years. Business as we know it today, and the ruthless pursuit of efficiency and market share, are actually relatively new concepts for us humans, and only maybe a hundred-plus years old. (See Scott Rosenberg's prognosis about blogging in corporate organizations - the item posted directly below this one).
And I think it's also a safe bet that VC's don't have all the answers - they tend, in my experience to lean towards the smug side of things. But then again, money is power, and they don't have to listen and watch and see things changing if they don't want to.
Personally, I think it's an open question, and I would respons with the following quote:
The speed at which we innovate far outstrips the speed with which we integrate ...
and I wouldn't count out the compound effects of digital generations coming into the business and work world ... just yet.
And ... if most everything that ever gets funded in the IT/software field is all about efficiency and features and "where's the revenue", without any attention to sociology, in another ten or so years we'll all be in one of two camps - we'll be a corporate Borg or serving corporations in Borg-like ways, or unemployed (except for a few percentage points of population who are self-employed doing something they actually like).
David Hornik - A VC's point of view on social networking and social software:
I attended yet another social networking panel this evening. It was the Churchill Club's event called Blogging and Social Networking: Who Cares? The panel was a cast of thousands, including such social software panel mainstays as Ross Mayfield, Marc Canter and Dan Gillmor. At this point I have seen enough of these panels to say with a fair degree of certainty that they are all the same. So in an effort to save you a bunch of time and aggravation, here's a transcription of this evening's event. I believe that it is essentially a transcription of all past and all future social software panels, so read it and free yourself of the need to ever attend such an event yourself:
"Welcome blah blah blah relationship capital blah blah blah social contracts blah blah blah media businesses blah blah blah identify the rabid fans of the iPod blah blah blah utility media blah blah blah this is the future of the web blah blah blah RSS blah blah blah Spam blah blah blah killer app blah blah blah business model blah blah blah advertising model blah blah blah is this a product or a feature blah blah blah a feature doesn't make a business blah blah blah leveraging relationships blah blah blah decentralized system blah blah blah privacy concerns blah blah blah profiling people blah blah blah social networking is blogging dumbed down for the masses blah blah blah tribecaster blah blah blah widget blah blah blah what is the connection between social networks and blogs blah blah blah the most efficient media platform ever blah blah blah read-write, not read-only blah blah blah all software is about people blah blah blah put this stuff in context blah blah blah monetizing relationships blah blah blah a new dimension to the web blah blah blah I met my wife on Match.com blah blah blah optimizing personal relationships and corporate relationships blah blah blah enhancing social capital blah blah blah wiki-based community blah blah blah collective action, common good blah blah blah we own these profiles blah blah blah it's compelling, it's sticky blah blah blah old media types blah blah blah disconnected media silo blah blah blah FOAF blah blah blah Blogger and TypePad blah blah blah building the network is trivial blah blah blah it's an enabling technology blah blah blah driving value blah blah blah after you've made the friends, there's nothing to do blah blah blah I've been monetizing my social relationships since my bar mitzvah blah blah blah have a persistent identity blah blah blah a lot of unintended consequences blah blah blah a mesh of meshs blah blah blah a meta network blah blah blah inner circle blah blah blah transparency is starting to have its cost blah blah blah valuable information blah blah blah composite identity blah blah blah connecting people blah blah blah transaction intent on both sides blah blah blah decentralizing force blah blah blah about wanting to be heard blah blah blah about wanting to be loved blah blah blah ego driven blah blah blah 50 years of passive media consumption blah blah blah network diversity is good blah blah blah reputation management blah blah blah open standards and open platforms win always blah blah blah it's group voice blah blah blah social context blah blah blah the entire web is a social network blah blah blah join me in thanking tonight's moderators blah blah blah goodnight."
Friday, June 25

Blogs Feel Real ... Online. That Means they'll Endure
by
jonh
on June 25, 2004 03:07PM (PDT)
Thanks to Seb's Open Research.
Tom Smith comes up with a totally rockin' list of formulas that explain the success of weblogs in learning / knowledge management. Via the social software channel.
• Bad Is the New Good ( It Really Is ) • Some Things Just Don't Work (And Never Did, Let's Get Over It) • People need to PeripherizeTM, Not Focus ( There is Too Much Information ) • Thinking Out Loud ( The Best Place to Do It ) • Informality Fucking Rocks ( Everybody Hates the Suits - Really ) • You Don't Know What You Know ( Really ) • You Probably Know Too Much To Even Begin Writing It Down ( Really Really ) • A Little And Often is Best ( Your Mum Was Right ) • The Link is God ( Which makes Google the Devil ) • Person Centric not Place Centric (You can only be in one place at a time) • Personal Taxonomies (Let Dublin Core catch up rather than dictate) • You Own Your Blog ( You Are Your Blog ) • Information Exists in the Context of People (And Always Has) • If It's Not Documented, It Really Doesn't Exist • Democracy is the Least Worst of the Alternatives (Let's Get Over It) • Reflection is the New Black (Who'd have thought?) • Lets Plan To Start Now, Plan Later (That's The Plan Anyway) • Passwords Blow Goats • Distributed AND Centralized (not OR) • Nobody Owns the Blog Concept • If Blogs are the Songs, RSS is the Home-made Compilation CD (RSS is cool) • People Can Cope With Simple ( Just about, but not always ) • Don't Try And Make The Computer Do Things It Can't And We Can ( i.e Manage Knowledge, Make Sense, Inspire, See Connections, Make Jokes, Cock Up) • Google for "Small Pieces Loosely Joined"

Bill Blog
by
jonh
on June 25, 2004 08:55AM (PDT)
Via Dave Winer's Scripting News:
Seattle Times reports that Bill Gates may start a weblog. "Bill's blog won't be all business."
Tim Jarrett: "Being linked by Bill will become the holy grail of
blogging at Microsoft and will somewhat diminish the thrill of getting
linked by Scoble."
Thursday, June 24

Interesting Development - Network Vs. Network
by
jonh
on June 24, 2004 08:35PM (PDT)
From Seb Pacquet's Open Research
Did you know the US army has embraced
collaborative weblogs on a private network? Greg Searle, who's the
founder and chief scientist at Tomoye, explained how that came about.
It's a very interesting story: two company commanders -tony &
russell - who lived next to one another in Hawaii discovered the
incredible value of informal conversation among peers for learning.
They ended up wroting a book
titled "Taking the Guidon" which became wildly popular within the army
and led to a guerilla knowledge management effort among people in that
position. A community of practice enabled by PHP-Nuke sprang up below
the radar and interest bubbled up over about two years.
Despite obvious resistance among
people in the upper ranks, it was eventually recognized that you need a
network to fight networks, and this internal blogging activity is now
officially endorsed, which is quite an about-face for the military
culture.
Greg said the passion of the
participants was a key factor in the success of the CoP. Also, when the
survival of your men depends on learning, it provides a powerful
incentive to find effective ways to learn.
.

Dan Gillmor on Blogging
by
jonh
on June 24, 2004 03:04PM (PDT)
Blogging Talk
Blogging's recognition as an important medium is growing. I've gotten
several calls lately from journalists writing about or discussing the
phenomenon:
Business Week did a story called "Blogging with the Boss' Blessing" (my quote got truncated, but I did say it).
NPR's Talk of the Nation devoted part of yesterday's show to blogging,
and had me join the discussion. (The NPR show was sparked by Time
Magazine's recent story.)
Critical mass is approaching, it seems.
Note: I'll be speaking on a panel later this week at the Supernova
conference in Silicon Valley. This is shaping up as an excellent
gathering.
Wednesday, June 23

A Rushing River of Info ...
by
jonh
on June 23, 2004 08:03AM (PDT)
From Business Week, via the blog Future Hi
Digital Convergence
There's an interesting article in Business Week about the growing
convergence between media and personal communication devices. Most of
the article is pretty business-oriented but there are some interesting
bits that tie in to our ongoing discussions about convergence, paradigm
shifts, and technological evolution. It's especially interesting to
consider the impact these technologies will have on communication and
information in the emerging global brain. Just as the complexity of the
human mind evolved to become self-aware, will the global mind have in
the not-too-distant future a similar awakening?
Some excerpts :
That sets up a collision of three massive industries. In one corner
stands the $1.1 trillion computer and software biz, with its American
leaders. In another is the $225 billion consumer-electronics sector,
with its strong Asian roots and a host of aggressive new Chinese
players. The third camp is the $2.2 trillion communications industry, a
behemoth that extends from wireless powerhouses in Asia and Europe to
the networking stars of Silicon Valley. All three groups will have a
hand in building the digital wonders that are headed our way...
The result is a Big Bang of convergence, and it's likely to produce the
biggest explosion of innovation since the dawn of the Internet...Hossein
Eslambolchi, president of AT&T Laboratories (T ), thinks the
changes ahead will be as significant as the advent of commercial
aviation in connecting people and communities. "This is going to be the
most disruptive period in the past 50 years," he says...
Driving this long-awaited trend are two powerful factors: the
relentless evolution of technology and the tech industry's hunger for
growth. For decades, the mere idea of a computer company making
Brazilian TVs or French phones would have been laughable. Those markets
were cloistered behind varying standards and a maze of diverse
technologies. But with the spread of digital technology and the rise of
Internet standards, those differences are fast melting away...
As these technologies evolve over the next decade, a new digital world will emerge. Analysts
predict that these nascent networks will speed up by an average of 50%
a year, the historic norm... As networks grow and chips continue to
strengthen, companies will work madly to come up with winning products
and services. Within the next five years, industry analysts say,
practically every machine in the wide realm of communications -- every
gadget that sings, talks, beams images, or messages -- will sport a
powerful computer and a network connection. And
every bit of digital information, whether it's a phone call, a song, a
Web page, or a movie, will flow among these machines in the very same
river of data...
The dramatic shifts ahead are likely to shake up age-old concepts at
the foundation of our economy. In the coming markets of moving bits,
who owns what?
Newcomers have defined each stage of the Information Era. And the
age of convergence offers perhaps the richest yet. Why? The networks
now taking shape will link together more than 1 billion people, not
just with words or voices, but with music, video, games, and commerce. A vast chunk of the world economy is going digital -- and for the next few years it's up for grabs.
This revolution won't quiet down anytime soon.
Tuesday, June 22

Blogging With The Boss's Blessing ...
by
jonh
on June 22, 2004 05:14PM (PDT)
.... More companies are helping employees to speak freely -- and bond with customers.
An article in the most recent Business Week about how companies are turning to blogs to communicate with and amongst employees and customers.

Things Leaders do
by
fred
on June 22, 2004 04:18PM (PDT)
In April, GE's CEO, Jeffrey Immelt, expanded on his top 10 leadership tips . At the same time, we asked Fast Company readers what they have learned about successful leaders, and Editor-in-Chief John A. Byrne expanded on the time he spent with Immelt and his predecessor Jack Welch. Here are some of the best responses Fast Company received. Source link: http://www.fastcompany.com/magazine/83/open_thingsleadersdo.htmlPowered by Quickdraft
|
Qumana Products & Downloads
What is the Qumana blog?
It's where you come for all the latest about Qumana, Lektora, and Q-Ads.
Contact Qumana
Need more info? Have a question or feedback? Contact us
|